Beyond the Usual Names: Why Local Influence Deserves a Closer Look
When teams talk about expert engagement, the same names often surface first. Well-known global KOLs. High publication counts. Frequent conference […]
When teams talk about expert engagement, the same names often surface first. Well-known global KOLs. High publication counts. Frequent conference […]
Medical and commercial teams rarely disagree on objectives. Both want relevant conversations, credible science, and measurable impact. Yet in practice,
Field and medical teams spend countless hours planning who to meet, what to discuss, and how to advance scientific conversations.
In medical affairs and field engagement, timing and context often decide the quality of every conversation. You can have the
Scientific engagement works best when it’s synchronized with how HCPs are thinking and talking today, not last quarter. That’s why
KEE targeting has evolved. Version 1.0 was spreadsheets of “top names.” Version 2.0 chased digital activity, who posts, where, and
Not all influence looks the same. Some experts write guidelines, others steer trial sites, and a growing cohort shapes thinking
Volume isn’t the same as influence. Some Key External Experts shape clinical thinking without posting daily threads or dominating conference panels. They
Identifying and engaging Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) requires more than just counting followers or publication citations. With rapid digitalization and innovation in
Digital Opinion Leaders (DOLs) have emerged as critical partners for healthcare organizations seeking to amplify scientific insights, foster clinician trust,